Hopefully, this piques your interest. I’ve not encountered any record of DFW stating outright that Sartre was a massive influence on his work, particularly Infinite Jest, but I think it’s implied throughout the novel that specific tenets of Sartrean philosophy are present. I think perspective might be an important concept for understanding this. Perspectives disclose a particular aspect of an object, a fragment of its possible expressions. You look at an apple and see it from one side, but you know there is more to it than that, there are other angles to So To Be Is To Do Soccer To Do Is To Be Sartre Do Be Do Scooby Doo Shirt view it from as well as an internal structure that you can’t even access without destroying it.
So To Be Is To Do Soccer To Do Is To Be Sartre Do Be Do Scooby Doo Shirt, Tank top, V-neck, Ladies Tee For Men and Women
Similarly, the meaning the apple can hold is more or less infinite depending on how you’re looking at it. It can be an object to eat, an artistic object to admire, a symbol for fruition, etc. I never said we have an infinite number of mental states in actuality, I said the thing perceived unveils sides or aspects of itself infinitely. Real-life objects aren’t like video game objects where you can come to So To Be Is To Do Soccer To Do Is To Be Sartre Do Be Do Scooby Doo Shirt an ‘end’ of them, where you reach the limit of their design.
Official So To Be Is To Do Soccer To Do Is To Be Sartre Do Be Do Scooby-Doo Sweatshirt, Hoodie
I don’t really know what that is. You tell me if that’s a reverse archetype. I am not saying the points of view of the egg are not infinite, so it could be both! I haven’t read Sartre so it is more than likely than anything that I’m way off. Thanks! Why do I interpret Sartre’s statement to reference the same dualism of the object-subject that Heidegger sought to So To Be Is To Do Soccer To Do Is To Be Sartre Do Be Do Scooby Doo Shirt abolish? And that the finite and infinite is the resulting dualism between Being and Non-Being. Is this at all related to what you’re talking about?